Picture1.jpg

Remove a 80 year old tax break!

Many states have not had adequate solvency for decades. These are not just economic echoes from the Great Recession either, economists and bureaucrats alike have warned a state trust funds not being healthy for decades. Therefore, the State is going to be charged interest on the Federal loans that are currently being taken out and tax payers are responsible for a 7 billion loan.

Wage growth vs taxable wage base growth.jpg

Salary growth has not kept pace with inflation!

In 1935 UI benefits didn’t cover women or agricultural workers (BIPOC) and the tax was levied on full wages. In 1939, progressives wanted more people eligible for benefits. As a "compromise" conservatives opened up benefits to women and agricultural workers but they wanted a tax break in return. That tax break was implemented by lowering the wage base from full wages to a $3,000 ceiling. Typically, a tax break happens through lowering the tax rate. In this case congress lowered the tax base as to circumvent having to get approval from the Social Security Board.

In 1939, the average salary was $1,338.00. This means that today, the ceiling should be at least $147,264.57 (Massachusetts average salary is $65,680.00).

Pro-business tax cut lawmakers want to sell people on "indexing to inflation" because $3,000 in today dollars is $55,000. As you can see, this is a classic example of how wages have not kept up with inflation, thus creating inequitable tax laws for low and median income people and small businesses. Furthermore, politically speaking, once a metric is indexed, it becomes very difficult to make future improvements. So we need to be very sure that a proposed system would work before locking it in by "indexing".


Previous
Previous

Experience Rating System

Next
Next

Administrative Burdens